Breaking: UK Labour Party, Israeli government tried to interfere in 2024 U.S. Presidential election using front groups to censor Americans
By ljdevon // 2025-01-25
Copy
 
In an era where information is both a weapon and a shield, a growing controversy has emerged: U.S. allies are leveraging front groups and digital platforms to manipulate online discourse, censor American voices, and influence U.S. elections. These claims, which have sparked heated debates among policymakers, cybersecurity experts, and journalists, suggest that foreign governments are using covert tactics to shape public opinion and sway electoral outcomes. The allegations raise critical questions about the integrity of democratic processes, the role of social media in modern politics, and the extent to which foreign influence operations are penetrating the digital lives of American citizens. Leaked documents have exposed the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), a UK-based NGO with ties to the UK Labour Party, for orchestrating covert operations to influence elections and political narratives in the U.S. and beyond. The revelations, detailed in a "Black Ops Memo," highlight a coordinated effort to manipulate democratic processes, raising serious ethical and legal concerns.

Key Findings:

1. Targeting RFK Jr.: CCDH planned "black ops" campaigns against U.S. presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., citing fears about his potential impact on the 2024 election. This deliberate targeting of a political figure blurs the line between advocacy and political interference. 2. Foreign Influence: The memo reveals CCDH's collaboration with the UK Labour Party, which deployed nearly 100 activists to U.S. battleground states like Nevada and Pennsylvania. These actions may violate U.S. laws, such as the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), which prohibits foreign nationals from influencing elections. 3. AI and Disinformation: CCDH explored using AI to create deepfakes and disinformation, such as fake scenarios involving political figures like Trump and Biden. These tactics aim to manipulate public perception and undermine trust in democratic processes. 4. Silencing Platforms: CCDH launched a campaign to discredit Elon Musk’s Twitter, framing it as a hub of disinformation. This effort sought to suppress dissenting voices and reshape public discourse, raising concerns about free speech. 5. State Actor Connections: Emails reveal CCDH’s ties to the Israeli government, suggesting the NGO may act as a conduit for foreign state influence. These connections complicate CCDH’s role, as it appears to serve both advocacy and covert political agendas.

Broader Implications:

• NGOs as Political Tools: CCDH’s actions highlight a troubling trend of NGOs being used for political interference, undermining their credibility and ethical governance. • U.S.-UK Relations: The revelations risk straining diplomatic ties, as CCDH’s ties to the UK Labour Party suggest foreign involvement in U.S. elections. • State Actor Influence: CCDH’s alleged connections to the Israeli government underscore the risks of state actors using NGOs to launder influence and manipulate global narratives.

UK Labour Party and Israeli government interfere in U.S. elections and violate U.S. laws

America First Legal has filed a complaint with the DOJ, urging an investigation into CCDH’s activities, citing potential violations of these laws. CCDH’s activities potentially breach several U.S. laws: • Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA): Requires foreign entities influencing U.S. politics to register with the Department of Justice. • Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA): Prohibits foreign nationals from contributing to U.S. elections, including logistical support. • Executive Order 13848: Targets foreign interference in elections through disinformation or manipulation.

Historical context: from Cold War propaganda to digital manipulation

The use of information as a tool of statecraft dates back centuries, but the methods have evolved dramatically. In the mid-20th century, the U.S. and its allies employed radio broadcasts, leaflets, and covert operations to counter Soviet influence during the Cold War. Similarly, the Soviet Union and its satellite states disseminated propaganda to undermine Western democracies. Fast forward to the 21st century, and the battlefield has shifted to the digital realm. The 2016 U.S. presidential election, in which Russian operatives were accused of using social media to sow discord and influence voters, marked a turning point in the recognition of digital information warfare. Since then, governments worldwide have ramped up efforts to monitor and counter foreign interference. However, the current allegations suggest that U.S. allies may be adopting similar tactics, albeit with different objectives. It's ironic that the very tools developed to combat foreign interference are now being used by allies to shape American politics. It raises serious ethical and legal questions. An America First government should hold their allies accountable and fight back against black ops attempting to censor individuals and manipulate U.S. elections for totalitarian purposes. Follow the evidence trail being published by Sayer Ji: Sources include: Substack.com GreenMedInfo.com GreenMedInfo.com
Copy