Biden’s preemptive pardon of Fauci sparks outrage, sets dangerous precedent
By isabelle // 2025-01-21
Copy
 
  • President Biden issued a controversial preemptive pardon for Dr. Anthony Fauci, shielding him from potential criminal investigations.
  • The pardon has drawn bipartisan criticism, with many viewing it as an admission of guilt and a dangerous precedent.
  • Fauci faced accusations of misleading Congress about COVID-19 origins and pandemic decisions, sparking public outrage.
  • Senator Rand Paul vows to continue investigating Fauci, despite the pardon, to uncover the truth about pandemic actions.
In a controversial move that has drawn sharp criticism from both sides of the political aisle, outgoing President Joe Biden issued a preemptive pardon to Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former chief medical advisor, just hours before Donald Trump’s inauguration on January 20. The pardon, which shields Fauci from potential criminal investigations, has been widely condemned as an admission of guilt and a dangerous precedent that allows those in power to evade accountability. The decision to pardon Fauci, who has been a lightning rod for criticism over his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, has reignited debates about justice, transparency, and the rule of law. Critics argue that the move undermines public trust in government institutions and sends a chilling message: those in positions of authority can endanger lives and walk away unscathed if the president shields them.

A pardon that speaks volumes

Biden’s pardon of Fauci, along with other high-profile figures such as retired General Mark Milley and members of the House Jan. 6 committee, has been met with widespread condemnation. Many view the preemptive nature of the pardon as an implicit acknowledgment of wrongdoing. “If there was ever any doubt as to who bears responsibility for the COVID pandemic, Biden’s pardon of Fauci forever seals the deal,” Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) wrote on X. Fauci, who served as the face of the federal government’s pandemic response, has been accused of misleading Congress about the origins of COVID-19 and the funding of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Many people feel that his decisions during the pandemic led to unnecessary deaths, economic devastation, and the erosion of civil liberties. By pardoning Fauci, Biden has effectively shielded him from potential legal consequences, leaving many Americans feeling betrayed. The pardon sets a troubling precedent by allowing individuals in power to act with impunity. “This act suggests that those in power can evade scrutiny, leaving the public without answers and without justice,” wrote Sayer Ji on X. “Such a precedent cannot stand unchallenged.” Senator Paul, who chairs the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, has vowed to continue investigating Fauci despite the pardon. “As Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, I will not rest until the entire truth of the coverup is exposed,” Paul said. His commitment to uncovering the truth has resonated with many who feel that Fauci’s actions during the pandemic warrant a full and transparent investigation. The backlash against Biden’s pardon has been swift and bipartisan. Activist Riley Gaines called the move “a new low,” while Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, urged President Trump to ignore the pardons and proceed with investigations. “The blanket pardons issued by Biden are invalid and constitutional nullities and should be considered to have no legal force or effect,” Fitton said. Even some Democrats have expressed discomfort with the concept of preemptive pardons. “I think preemptive pardons seem to imply guilt,” Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D-Mass.) previously told NewsNation. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) echoed these concerns, stating, “I didn’t like the pardon of the president’s son. I didn’t think that was prudent.”

A legacy of controversy

Biden’s last-minute pardons, particularly that of Fauci, have cast a shadow over his presidency. By shielding individuals from potential legal consequences, Biden has raised serious questions about accountability and the rule of law. As Senator Paul and others continue their investigations, the American public will be watching closely to see if justice can still be served. In the end, Biden’s decision to pardon Fauci may be remembered not as an act of mercy but as a glaring example of how power can be used to protect the powerful at the expense of the people. Sources for this article include: X.com NYPost.com YourNews.com ZeroHedge.com
Copy